California common law marriage – Myth and Reality

california common law marriage california common law marriage California common law marriage – Myth and Reality 496fe864b57f4dea80ddfb6d05a799fc 1032749090 300x300California Common Law Marriage doctrine.

California Common Law Marriage – Myth or Reality?

Common law marriage is a situation in which a couple live together as if they were husband and wife; buying properties, sharing bank accounts, raising kids, but never got a marriage license.

Although California abolished the common law marriage doctrine in 1895, there are some exceptions in which a California court would consider a common law marriage as valid. For example, if the couple were living in
a common law marriage jurisdiction and satisfied all the requirements for common law marriage in this jurisdiction, they are married under the law of that state. If they decide to relocate in California later, their
marriage will be recognized.

There are about ten states in the USA which recognize common law marriage.

Each state has different requirements to define common law marriage such as, how long the parties need to live with each other to qualify for common law marriage and the minimum age they should be, etc.

Another exception for recognizing California common law marriage is a contractual relationships between parties.
In the famous California case, Marvin v. Marvin, Michel sued her partner for financial for spousal support. The court awarded Michel to claim such support even though the parties were never officially married, but
lived together. She eventually lost the claim because she could not prove the contractual relationship.
Other cases were successful provided that a party could show either an explicit written agreement or an implied agreement that parties intended to provide support or share properties.

In order to show that a California Common Law marriage was valid, the written contract does not need to be drafted professionally; if the major provisions of a the basic understanding of a contractual relationship is
provided, the judge could fill the gaps if there are any, and then divide properties according to community properties principles or awarding financial support.

If you are trying to provide evidence that you have a California Common Law marriage without a written agreement, it is more challenging, but possible.
The court will look at the factors such as whether the parties were commingling their finances, whether they purchased a house in both of their names, whether each of them placed a down payment on that house.
In consideration of financial support the, court will look at why one of the spouses quit his/her job. Perhaps one of the couple sacrificed his/her career to take care of the others needs, did cleaning, cooking relying that it if the relationship would be broken, she/he would be entitled to financial support.

If you are in a California Common Law marriage relationship and thinking about ending relationship

there are many factors you will need to value and it would be a good idea to see a divorce attorney.

  1. California and Common Law Marriage: California does not recognize common law marriage as a legal institution within its jurisdiction. As mentioned, the state abolished common law marriage over a century ago, in 1895. This means that no matter how long a couple has lived together or how commingled their lives and finances may be, California law does not grant them the legal status of being married simply based on those factors.
  2. Recognition of Out-of-State Common Law Marriages: However, California, like other states, recognizes the “full faith and credit” clause of the U.S. Constitution, meaning it respects and acknowledges the laws and judicial decisions of other states within the United States. Consequently, if a couple legally establishes a common law marriage in a state that recognizes such unions (provided they meet that state’s specific criteria for common law marriage), and they later move to California, California will recognize their marriage as valid.
  3. Contractual Relationships and Marvin Claims: The case of Marvin v. Marvin, which you referenced, is a landmark case in California that does indeed provide a basis for financial support and property division for couples who have cohabitated but are not formally married. The principle behind “Marvin” claims is that even without a marriage, individuals can enter into agreements, explicit or implied, regarding their property and financial support. These agreements can be enforceable in court, similar to how disputes in business relationships might be resolved. However, proving such agreements exists can be challenging without clear, written documentation.
  4. Evidence of Non-Marital Co-habitation Agreements: In cases where there is no formal written agreement, courts will look at various factors to determine if an agreement existed between the parties. These factors might include joint financial activities, property co-ownership, and the overall nature of the relationship. Each party’s contributions to the relationship, financially or otherwise (such as sacrificing a career), may also be considered.
  5. Seeking Legal Advice: Given the complexities and nuances of proving a non-marital cohabitation agreement or asserting rights similar to those of a spouse, it’s indeed advisable for individuals to seek legal counsel. A family law attorney can provide guidance on the specific evidence needed and the potential legal strategies to pursue claims for property division or support.

In summary, although common law marriage is not a legal status in California, paths have been left open through which couples can demand similar rights just like married couples through the creation of contractual relationships, which includes cohabitation. Should a person get involved in these legal tricks and turns, getting an advice from an experienced family law attorney is very important. These are better handled properly with the right personalized advice.

Following the above-mentioned discussion of non-marital relationships and the legal considerations in California, it is pertinent to look deeper into the practical steps individuals could pursue for protecting rights and interests when in a cohabitating relationship likely to be comparable to marriage in function but not in form.

Practical Steps for Protecting Rights in Non-Marital Relationships

  1. Cohabitation Agreements: In a way, this agreement is similar to a prenuptial agreement and allows someone to outline how property will be divided, how much support will be given, and how other responsibilities will be attended to should the relationship come to an end. The fact is that these agreements actually represent such a clear, legally binding document that reflects the intentions and agreements of all involved parties.
  2. Ownership of Property: For couples who purchase property together, consideration should be given to how that property is titled. Holding property as joint tenants with rights of survivorship or as tenants in common can have far-reaching implications in terms of how the property will be divided upon the cessation of a relationship or the passing of one party.
  3. Financial Planning: Proper record-keeping of whoever contributes to what will be of great essence, particularly when it comes to the issue of purchasing property, home improvement, or whatever major issues of investment certainly arising in the nature of the sharing arrangements between the parties.
  4. Estate planning: Clearly, in absence of marriage, one may articulate the legal arrangement that shall ensure that the partner benefits in the case of eventuality of death. This may involve wills, trusts, healthcare directives, and durable powers of attorney recognizing the partner and providing for them as the owner desires.
  5. Parental Rights: Establishing legal parentage and custody arrangements is a great way to protect the rights of the parents and children when dealing with issues of paternity for couples raising children. This may actually mean the legal adoption procedures or formal agreements regarding the parenting roles and obligations.

Challenges in Proving Non-Marital Agreements

Non-inclusion of such factors, however, ensures that the problem of proving the existence of an agreement does exist in the court, especially in view of there being no written document through which such terms can either be evidenced or proved. Present evidence would be given in courtrooms in the form of:

Written communications: Ejsons, texts, or letters exchanged between them in which the intentions of the parties, their plans, or the agreement between them concerning the relationship and their property are discussed.

Witness Testimony: Friends, family members, or other people who are familiar with the dynamics of the relationship, nature of the power structure, and any agreements or understanding between you.

Behavioural evidence of what is presented to the public by the couple, buying property or any other item jointly, sharing of expenses, or other evidence from behaviour that would tend to show a joint understanding or agreement.

The Role of Legal Advice

Given all these possibilities and the fact that it is pretty complex to establish their rights and agreements outside of marriage, this is where orientation of legal advisors becomes indispensable. Some other issues in which a family lawyer can offer advice include the following:

  • Preparing a cohabitation agreement or another form of legal document to implement the financial, property, and property arrangements in the relationship. – Advising on property ownership and estate planning to protect both parties’ interests.

• Representing the persons in cases to do with the division of property, financial support, and any other issues emanating from the end of a relationship.

Conclusion Though California does not recognize common law marriage, the state allows ample mechanisms within its legal regime for the person in such a relationship to protect his or her interests and rights. In fact, couples can frame their relationship similarly to marriage in that advance planning and legal agreements ensure that the relationship will be handled in a clear-cut fashion. In view of these complexities, a prospective research partner would need to seek legal advice that would properly guide them in such arrangements, for assurance of accurate documentation of the intentions of both parties and enforceability.



If you have any
questions please call 714-390-3766

Comments (1)

[…] Palimony law based on the Common Law Marriage concept. . Generally,the State of California does have not recognised common-law marriages with an exception […]

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.